Legal Opinion

Joe Hatton, Inc. v. Conner

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 16, 1970No. 38666PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, Justice.

We have for review by direct appeal a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County upholding the constitutionality of “The Florida Sweet Corn Marketing Order,” (As revised, January 18, 1963; Ch. 7 1-4, Fla.Admin.Code), and approving the manner in which it is currently applied. Jurisdiction attaches under Article V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. We affirm this decision.

This case is a continuation of Conner v. Joe Hatton, Inc., 216 So.2d 209 (Fla.1968). Appellant is a handler of sweet corn in southern Florida and as such is subject to the Marketing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Liquor Store v. Continental Distilling Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1949
  3. Hunter v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. Conner v. Joe Hatton, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
  5. State, Department of Citrus v. GriffinSupreme Court of Florida · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fla. League of Cities, Inc. v. Admin. Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Smith v. Department of Business RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1992
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API