Joe Hatton, Inc. v. Conner
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CARLTON, Justice.
We have for review by direct appeal a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County upholding the constitutionality of “The Florida Sweet Corn Marketing Order,” (As revised, January 18, 1963; Ch. 7 1-4, Fla.Admin.Code), and approving the manner in which it is currently applied. Jurisdiction attaches under Article V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. We affirm this decision.
This case is a continuation of Conner v. Joe Hatton, Inc., 216 So.2d 209 (Fla.1968). Appellant is a handler of sweet corn in southern Florida and as such is subject to the Marketing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Liquor Store v. Continental Distilling Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1949
- Hunter v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Conner v. Joe Hatton, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
- State, Department of Citrus v. GriffinSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fla. League of Cities, Inc. v. Admin. Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Smith v. Department of Business RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1992
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports2010