Legal Opinion
Palman v. Reynolds
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1944No. Docket No. 48, Calendar No. 42,848PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
This is a petition for a declaratory-judgment under Act No. 36, Pub. Acts 1929 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13903 et seq. [Stat. Ann. § 27.501 et seq.]), to determine tbe rights of a lessee under an alleged lease on a store building.
Florence L. Reynolds, one of the defendants, of the city of Adrian, and Margaret Butler, of the State, of Idaho, are the owners, with the right of survivor-ship, of premises situate in the city of Adrian, Michigan. Defendant Reynolds is entitled to the rents and benefits of said premises during her lifetime. Margaret Butler has no present benefits from the property. Her…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dillon v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
3Cited by14 opinions
- Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Paris TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Skinner v. HaugsethDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Modular Systems, Inc. v. NaisbittCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Cox v. BerryUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Heritage Building Property, LLC v. Prime Income Asset Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.