Legal Opinion

Roeur Van v. Kurt Jones, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2007No. 04-2277Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

475 F.3d 292

Roeur VAN, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Kurt JONES, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-2277.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: March 6, 2006.

Decided and Filed: January 16, 2007.

ARGUED: Mary Beth Young, Jones Day, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. William C. Campbell, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Mary Beth Young, Holly H. Saigo, Jones Day, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. William C. Campbell, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee.

Before BOGGS, Chief Judge; and MOORE and COOK, Circuit Judges.

2Opinion of the Court · BoggsBoggs, C.J.

COOK, J.,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

3Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API