Santee v. Day
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill to foreclose. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1903.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Presiding Justice Adams
delivered the opinion of the court.
The evidence shows very clearly that Charles E. Stade and Alfred A. Ames conspired to defraud Friedrich Kolze, or persons to whom some of the two series of notes mentioned in the preceding statement might be, by them negotiated. Abraham L. Day, although ignorant of what was intended, was indifferent and careless as to everything except the compensation promised him and his personal safety, and, by assisting to carry out the conspiracy, became a party to it. It would seem from the testimony of Day that the plan to defraud had been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kingsbury v. BurnsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Rupert v. MarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
- Dale v. LincolnIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Conner v. GoodmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Michael Sullivan, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ford City Bank, Third-Party-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988