Legal Opinion

United States v. Veal

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 4, 1998No. 95-4427PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals from convictions of police officers under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3) for providing false and misleading information concerning the death of a drug dealer to state investigators present the issue of whether statements suppressed in a prior civil rights trial pursuant to Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 87 S.Ct. 616, 17 L.Ed.2d 562 (1967), 1 can be admitted in a subsequent obstruction of justice trial. The police officers also challenge the district judge’s denial of their motions to dismiss, statutory interpretation, and jury instructions as well…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. CBS Inc., Fox Broadcasting Co. v. Primetime 24 Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Gold Star Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Jeffrey McKinley v. City of MansfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. BelfastCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Tony E. EmeryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API