Frank & Darrow v. Blake
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Warren Circuit Court. Action upon a promissory note. The defendant admits the execution of the note, but avers that the same was obtained from him without consideration and by fraud. There was a trial by jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant. The plaintiffs appeal. ‘
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
1. PROMISSORY notes: fraudulent: bonifide purchaser : partnership. The note was executed, payable to the order of the maker, and indorsed by him in blank and given to one Parsons, who transferred it before maturity, and for a valuable consideration, to the plaintiffs, who 7X7 are PartnGrs- The note was given under an arrangement whereby the defendant was to become the agent of the American Hog Cholera Cure Company, of Eureka, Iowa. "Without setting out in detail, the facts relied upon by defendant, it is sufficient to say that there was evidence tending to show that the note was procured hy…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of Philpott v. PhilpottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Connelly v. Greenfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- McCosker & Molloy v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- First National Bank v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Bennett State Bank v. SchloesserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.