Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Continental Insurance Company

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1966No. 36068, 36069, 36070PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiff brought these actions to recover on three fire insurance policies which provided that “No suit * * * shall be sustainable * * * unless commenced within twelve months next after inception of the loss.” In each case the insurer demurred to plaintiff’s petition on the ground of noncompliance with the clause of the contract. The district court sustained the demurrers and dismissed the petitions. Plaintiff has appealed, his assignments of error being common to the three cases.

Plaintiff commenced these actions February 7, 1963. A fire loss within policy coverage had occurred February 8,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Martin v. HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Olson Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Insurance Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Dawson County v. WhaleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. McNameeNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Paul E. Rhodes v. Norval Houston, Paul E. Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. Meyer, Paul E. Rhodes v. Richard M. Van SteenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  2. Hiram Scott College v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Wulf v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Brodine v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Rhodes v. Continental Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API