Legal Opinion

Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. McNamee

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1933No. 28528PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based on an instructed verdict for defendants McNamee. The cause of action was grounded upon a note, negotiable in form, signed by defendants James J. McNamee and Mike Mc-Namee, son and father, in favor of “The Ord Linotype School, Irl D. Tolen, Owner,” for $1,163.50, dated No*72vember 20, 1929, due on demand, duly indorsed by Irl D. Tolen to plaintiff, who thus became the owner of it. The Ord Linotype School was a trade-name under which Tolen operated. There was judgment against Tolen, from which he did not appeal.

The McNamees pleaded (among other things…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clearwater Bank v. KurkonskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Beickler ex rel. Beickler v. GuentherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Batty v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Farmers State Bank v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madison County v. CrippenNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Rhodes v. Continental Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Weekes v. RumbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API