Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. McNamee
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based on an instructed verdict for defendants McNamee. The cause of action was grounded upon a note, negotiable in form, signed by defendants James J. McNamee and Mike Mc-Namee, son and father, in favor of “The Ord Linotype School, Irl D. Tolen, Owner,” for $1,163.50, dated No*72vember 20, 1929, due on demand, duly indorsed by Irl D. Tolen to plaintiff, who thus became the owner of it. The Ord Linotype School was a trade-name under which Tolen operated. There was judgment against Tolen, from which he did not appeal.
The McNamees pleaded (among other things…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clearwater Bank v. KurkonskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Pill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Beickler ex rel. Beickler v. GuentherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Batty v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Farmers State Bank v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madison County v. CrippenNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Rhodes v. Continental Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Weekes v. RumbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1944