Legal Opinion

Aiken Et Ux. v. Less Taylor Motor Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1946No. 6914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Plaintiffs below appeal the decision of the Third District Court in their unlawful detainer suit against the defendant motor company.

This case involves the interpretation of a written lease and the determination of whether or not the option to renew included therein was exercised by the Lessee. The lease was entered into by one of the appellants as lessor and respondent as lessee on the 25th of September, 1941. The parts of the lease pertinent to this case read as follows:

“Harold W. Aiken. * * *, the lessor hereby remise, release and let to Less Taylor Motor Co., Inc. * * *,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sandall v. SandallUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Chretien v. . DoneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  3. Dalton v. StoutUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Fritz v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1925
  5. Brown v. MerriottUtah Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graziano v. GrazianoUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Graziano v. GrazianoUtah Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API