Graziano v. Graziano

I dissent from the reversal of the rather paltry awards of $25 alimony per month *193for one year and the $250 attorney’s fee. This for two reasons: 1) Nobody appealed therefrom, and 2) they are not unsupported by the record.

As to 1): Appellant did not attack the awards mentioned on appeal, but only the findings incident to the divorce and child custody awards. I invite anyone to point put in this record where appellant specifically attacked the awards which the main opinion now reverses.

Consistency is no jewel here. This court,, in Sandall v. Sandall,1 has said it would not consider errors not…