Legal Opinion

Watson v. Weick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2005No. 30988PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This case arises out of the failure of Appellant John Weick (Weick) to comply with Respondent Judge John T. Mitchell’s (Judge Mitchell) order to appear at a debtor’s exam. Respondent subsequently found Appellant in contempt and sentenced him to five days in jail. The case comes to this Court on appeal from Judge Mitchell ordering Weick to five days in jail. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2002, Rocky and Mary Watson (collectively the Watsons) filed a complaint against John and Julie Weick (collectively the Weicks) seeking to recover on a promissory note used…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Straub v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Le VequeIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Cafferty v. State, Dept. of Transp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Abell v. AbellIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API