Legal Opinion
Specter v. Garrett
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 18, 1993No. 91-1932PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*406OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
This action to enjoin the defendants from carrying out a decision to close the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard is before us for the second time. In our initial opinion in this case, Specter v. Garrett, 971 F.2d 936 (3d Cir.1992), we held, inter alia, that plaintiffs’ claim that the closing of the Shipyard would be illegal because it would be the product of a process inconsistent with certain procedural mandates of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 could proceed in the district court. Our mandate, however, was vacated by the Supreme…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dalton v. SpecterSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- United States of America, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Movant-Appellant v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Black Hills Institute of Geological Research v. South Dakota School of Mines & TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.