Legal Opinion

Boisselle v. Boisselle

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 24, 1994No. 90-321PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

On motion to modify by plaintiff, Roberta Boisselle, the Chittenden Superior Court modified a divorce decree to amend a provision dealing with the disposition of the family residence. Defendant, Raymond Boisselle, appeals arguing that the court did not have the power to modify the preexisting property award. We agree and reverse.

The parties were divorced on October 25, 1984. The court’s order, which was based on a stipulation, gave custody of the parties’ minor child to plaintiff and required defendant to pay $75 per week in child support, with a cost of living adjustment provision. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia Appeal of Edwin A. Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Rudd v. RuddIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Kerr v. KerrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Youngbluth v. YoungbluthSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. Mayo v. MayoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. Clapp v. ClappSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. Schwartz v. HaasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API