Stofer v. Ramsey
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the minor-plaintiff in an attack by a dog named King. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Each defendant moved separately for a summary judgment. Rule 56(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each such motion lacks merit.
I
This action is governed by the law of Tennessee. 28 U.S.C. § 1652; Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins (1938), 304 U.S. 64, 78, 58 S.Ct. 817, 822, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 1194. Under Tennessee law,
* * * the owner or keeper of the dog is not answerable for injuries done by it when in a place it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schwartz v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- Stagner v. CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- KMI Group, Inc. v. Wade Acres, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019