Legal Opinion

Stofer v. Ramsey

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided February 1, 1982No. CIV-4-81-8PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the minor-plaintiff in an attack by a dog named King. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Each defendant moved separately for a summary judgment. Rule 56(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each such motion lacks merit.

I

This action is governed by the law of Tennessee. 28 U.S.C. § 1652; Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins (1938), 304 U.S. 64, 78, 58 S.Ct. 817, 822, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 1194. Under Tennessee law,

* * * the owner or keeper of the dog is not answerable for injuries done by it when in a place it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Schwartz v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Stagner v. CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. KMI Group, Inc. v. Wade Acres, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API