Legal Opinion

Quee Drug Co. v. Plaut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, tlie Quee Drug Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 23d day of December, 1899, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term dismissing the complaint on the merits.

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.:

The plaintiff corporation seeks to annul its bill of sale to the defendants on the ground that it was executed and delivered by its *88president without'due authority. John Quee owned a drug shop in Bath Beach, and his wife was the nominal owner .of a second sliopin Third avenue, Brooklyn, which Quee had purchased from liis father’s estate but had taken in her name. Quee and his wife owed the defendants about $1,300 for drugs, and on January 31, 1898,. they gave a note therefor. On February.10, 1898, Quee caused the Quee Drug Company to be incorporated with one hundred shares-of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKiernan v. LenzenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hall v. Herter Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hall v. . Herter BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Kenosha Electric Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Jacksonville American Publishing Co. v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. Moses v. SouleNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Ferrell v. Durham Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Dill & Collins Co. v. MorisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API