Heywood v. State

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[T1] Upon remand from this Court, the appellant was again convicted of three counts of second-degree sexual assault. He raises in this second appeal issues of his constitutional right to adequate notice of the charges being brought against him, and of the admissibility of uncharged misconduct evidence. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] 1. Was the appellant adequately advised of the charges being brought against him?

2. Did the district court abuse its discretion by admitting certain uncharged misconduct evidence?

FACTS

[¶ 3] The facts of this case as previously recited by the Court can…