Legal Opinion

In re Grigsby

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 6, 1925No. 1728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The appellant applied for a design patent for a device known as a weather shield and glare visor. The article consists of an aluminum frame having a central dividing rib, and carrying two translucent sections or panes. It is of the type to be mounted above the wind shield at the front of an automobile, in order to protect the wind shield from rain and sleet, and to shield the driver from the glare of the sun.

The application was rejected by the Acting Examiner, upon the ground that the design was not new, original, and ornamental, in view of certain prior design patents,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Battery Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. Battery Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  3. In re WillisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API