Legal Opinion
Battery Patents Corporation v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 13, 1937No. 6871PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice.
The appellant, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, is assignee of the application of one George S. Lewis seeking a design patent for a combined bicycle guard and lamp. The application was rejected by the Examiner, and on appeal the Board of Appeals sustained the Examiner’s rejection. The plaintiff then filed a bill in equity in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, as amended (35 U.S.C. § 63 [35 U.S.C.A. § 63]), alleging the filing and due prosecution of the application and seeking a decree…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Graff, Washbourne & Dunn v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Steffens v. SteinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Knapp v. Will & Baumer Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Battery Patents Corp. v. Chicago Cycle Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Application of Jack H. HofstetterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Patriarca Mfg., Inc. v. SosnickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Patriarca Mfg., Inc. v. SosnickDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Patriarca Mfg., Inc. v. SosnickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.