Legal Opinion
Booth v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1952No. 13253PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Booth appeals from an order of the district court denying him his application for a writ of habeas corpus directed to Dr. Marion R. King, Superintendent of the California Medical Facility, a California State Institution at San Pedro, California. The application alleged that Booth was illegally held under two judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in which he pled guilty under the fraudulent representation of the prosecuting attorney.
Although it was not questioned and the district court in fact found that Booth was in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McNealy v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Hayman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Jones v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Booth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Ernest Grandville Booth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. BoothDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953