Legal Opinion

State v. . Strickland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.

Two cases against the defendant, charging him with incest with his two daughters, respectively, were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty of the charge with Esther Strickland and guilty of the charge with Bernice Strickland Hughes. From judgment of imprisonment the defendant appealed, assigning as error, inter alia, tbat tbe court admitted in evidence, over bis objection and declined to strike from tbe evidence upon bis motion, tbe testimony of Bernice Strickland Hughes, bis daughter, to tbe effect tbat she was born before her father, tbe defendant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. State v. . MikleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. State v. . GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. State v. . FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. GaskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. State v. TemplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API