Security-First National Bank v. Leatart
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
This is a controversy among seven brothers, one being in opposition to the other six, concerning the division of the sum of $5,000.02. Since it is conceded by all parties that the fund should be divided equally among the seven individual litigants, the final judgment in the action will merely determine whether (1) each party shall receive his share directly from the fund now on deposit in court or (2) the entire amount shall be paid to the administrator of the estate of the mother of the parties who, after first'deducting *213his fees as administrator and the fees of his attorney and the other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Mowry v. HeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Power v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Blackledge v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Lewis v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pinsky v. SloatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Rich v. ErvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Camperi v. ChiechiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Berendsen v. McIverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hebert v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.