Legal Opinion

State v. Holland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1982No. 82-035PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Defendant-appellant, Ernest E. Holland, was adjudged guilty, pursuant to a jury verdict, of theft of property valued at over $300 but less than $1,000. He was sentenced to a term of not less than 20 months nor more than 5 years in the Nebraska Penal Complex, and was granted credit for 100 days’ prior incarceration time.

In this appeal defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain the conviction, in that proof of the value of the items taken was inadequate. We disagree; accordingly, the action of the trial court is affirmed.

The items taken were an amateur…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AustinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. TrueNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. LingleNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. GoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. WeikNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PointerNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Interest of Shea B.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. HochstetlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In re Interest of Zoie H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. LaymonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API