Legal Opinion

State v. Hochstetler

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1983No. 82-529PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Following a trial by jury the defendant-appellant, Beverly J. (Pat) Hochstetler, was convicted of exercising control over property owned by another. In this appeal she contends the trial court erred by (1) failing to grant defendant’s motion, made at the close of the State’s case in chief, to dismiss the information; (2) failing to grant her motion for a directed verdict made at the close of the State’s case in chief; (3) failing to grant a new trial because of newly discovered evidence; and (4) imposing as a condition of probation the requirement that she “refrain totally from acting as her…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Flakus v. SchugNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Henggler v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. BecknerNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. PittmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. HilpertNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MichalskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. RustNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Holt County Cooperative Ass'n v. Corkle's, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. PerrigoNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Interest of HochstetlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API