Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

The complaint, in so far as is material to this decision, alleges that the parties entered into the following agreement in writing:

“ The Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Company “ 100 William Street
“ New York, Mar. 17, 1917
“ Messrs. Zimmerman & Forshay,
“ 9 & 11 Wall St.,
“New York.
“ Dear Sirs: We are in receipt of your favor of even date and herewith confirm our understanding in accordance with which we have bought from you Mks 3,000,000 — (Three Million) at the rate of 73 3/8 for delivery during the month of October 1917. It is understood that the Marks are to be paid for here and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peabody v. . SpeyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Equitable Trust Co. v. . KeeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Melzer v. ZimmermanNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Melzer v. ZimmermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zimmermann v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API