Legal Opinion
United States v. Ocampo
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1980No. 80 CR 00061PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
This suppression motion raises questions concerning the sufficiency of the evidence necessary to satisfy the legal and constitutional standards applicable to unwarranted arrests, investigative stops, consent searches, plain view seizures, auto searches, warranted apartment seizures, post-arrest statements, and photographic and in-court identifications. Defendants Daniel Ocampo, Theodoro Hernandez, Carlos Cardona, Jose Vincente Otero, and Nicholas Antonio Munoz-Velasquez are charged in a two-count indictment with distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Jose CeballosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Daniel Ocampo, Theodoro Hernandez, Jose Otero, and Nicholas Munoz-VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- State v. FarrellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- United States v. CurryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.