Legal Opinion

In re Andrew N.

New York City Family Court

Decided February 23, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. McLaughlin, J.

In each of the three subject cases it was alleged that the respondent committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would have constituted a crime. In each of the cases a verified petition was filed in Family Court pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act, more than two months after the alleged act was committed. Further, in each of the cases, the respondent moved for the dismissal of the petition on the grounds that the provisions of subdivision (c) of section 734 of the Family Court Act, with regard to the time within which a petition can be filed had been exceeded. However, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In re Patrick G.New York Family Court · 1977
  3. In re George O.New York City Family Court · 1981
  4. In re GiffordNew York City Family Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API