Legal Opinion

Ertman v. City of Olympia

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1980No. 46675PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, J. —

This case presents the question whether the trial court properly granted respondents' (defendants') motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. In an unpublished opinion, the Court of Appeals held that the grant of a new trial was proper, and we affirm the Court of Appeals.

Petitioner (plaintiff) Evan Ertman filed an action against respondents City of Olympia and Olympia police officers Donald Hume and Richard Minshull for assault, wrongful arrest, and imprisonment, stemming from an incident which occurred in the men's restroom of the Governor House…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pannell v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cheney v. City of Mountlake TerraceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. RemickWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Diamond v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Jones v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Estate of JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API