Legal Opinion
Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided October 20, 1989No. 88-CA-2515-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Judge.
The appellant, Charles Moore, has appealed from the summary judgment of the Laurel Circuit Court in this action for damages due to his default on an automobile lease. Moore leased the vehicle, a 1984 Ford Escort automobile, from Paducah Ford, Inc., by execution of a form entitled “Net (Closed End) Lease, Purchase Option” on March 9, 1984. The lease contemplated, with disclosure, immediate assignment to the appellee, Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford Credit), and it was so assigned. The lease provided for a total of 48 monthly payments of $158.44 ($7,605.12 over the entire lease…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Paintsville Hospital Co. v. RoseKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Northwest Collectors, Inc. v. EndersWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Gill v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
- Miles v. ProffittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- United Leasing & Financial Services, Inc. v. R. F. Optical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Swate v. Medina Community Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- In Re DaileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1994