State ex rel. O'Neill v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
This court has considered this appeal, SUSAN A EHRLICH, P.J., and WILLIAM F. GARBARINO and CECIL B. PATTERSON, Jr., JJ., participating.
The petitioner challenges the ruling of the municipal court and its affirmance by the superior court suppressing breath test results because the test was administered more than two hours after the respondent’s operation of a motor vehicle. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The following facts are undisputed. On August 25, 1994, David A Kankelfritz (“respondent”) was involved in a two-car…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RootCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. ClaybrookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. GuerraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. RootCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999