Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of Insurance
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentUdall, Justice
(dissenting) :
The majority opinion interprets the constitutional and statutory provisions in issue to mean that the appellate jurisdiction granted the court of appeal is concurrent with that of the Supreme Court and that therefore, not only under the more than forty specific laws in the Arizona statutes similar to the one in the instant case, but in all cases there is a right of direct appeal to this Court. I respectfully dissent.
' I think that the legislature intended by the enactment of A.R.S. §§ 12-120.21 and 12-2101 to repeal by implication those portions of statutes similar to A.R.S. §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Stevens v. Mehagian's Home Furnishings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Knape v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Arizona Tax Commission v. Dairy & Consumers Cooperative Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.