Legal Opinion
Sloan Construction Co. v. Southco Grassing, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided April 24, 2006No. 4085PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, J.:
Sloan Construction Company, Inc., (“Sloan”) appeals the dismissal of its action against the South Carolina Department of Transportation (“SCDOT”), arguing South Carolina Code Sections 29-6-250 and 57-5-1660(a)(2) (Supp.2004) give rise to a private right of action against a violating state agency. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts of this case are largely uncontested. SCDOT hired Southco Grassing, Inc., (“Southco”) as the general contractor on state highway project no. 23.504 (“the Project”). Pursuant to South Carolina Code Sections 29-6-250 and 57-5-1660(a)(2) (Supp.2004), Southco…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Active Fire Sprinkler Corp. v. The United States Postal Service and John T. Brady and Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Hawkins v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Brown v. LeveretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Devlin Lumber and Supply Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quail Hill, LLC v. County of RichlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Shirley's Iron Works, Inc. v. City of UnionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Sloan Construction Co. v. Southco Grassing, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Quail Hill, LLC v. County of RichlandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Shirley's Iron Works, Inc. v. City of UnionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.