Legal Opinion

Devlin Lumber and Supply Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1973No. 73-1530PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the liability of the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2674, for the loss suffered by a materialman because the government’s contracting officer failed to require a payment bond from the contractor, as required by the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a.

The Federal Tort Claims Act makes the United States liable, “ * * * relating to tort claims, in the same manner and to the same extent as a private Individual under like circumstances 28 U.S.C. § 2674. The Miller Act is a direction to federal contracting officers, and applicable only to them.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. Robert Smith, D/B/A Smith Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  3. Westbay Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United Scottish Insurance Company v. United States of America, Kathleen M. Fleming v. United States of America, Simone C. Weaver v. United States of America, John William Dowdle, Jr. v. United States of America, Maxine Cearley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Liuzzo v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API