Brown v. Dorney Park Coaster Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
Jurisdiction in the instant case is based on diversity. The law of Pennsylvania governs. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 114 A. L.R. 1487. See also Kehoe v. Central Park Amusement Co., 3 Cir., 52 F.2d 916, 917. The plaintiffs are husband and wife. The wife sued for damages for personal injuries ; the husband, to recover for loss of his wife’s services and society. The plaintiffs alleged that the wife-plaintiff was injured because of a defective table top. We think that clarity will be more readily achieved in this opinion if we give a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Lamp v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Oberheim v. Pennsylvania Sports & Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Bechtel v. Franklin Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Georgia Saddler v. Bethel Markets, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Georgia Saddler v. Bethel Markets, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Wisnewski v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951