Legal Opinion

Wisnewski v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 7, 1951No. 10269Published

1Opinion of the Court

STALEY, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by plaintiff, a pedestrian, against defendant railroad to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff in a grade crossing accident. After verdict and judgment for plaintiff, the motions of defendant for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial were denied.

Diversity of citizenship is the basis of federal jurisdiction, and Pennsylvania law governs the substantive rights of the parties. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 1938, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188.

The facts, interpreted in the light most favorable to plaintiff, briefly are as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Scholl v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Tull v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Baltimore & O. R. v. MuldoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Harris v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API