Legal Opinion
Aldridge, Admr. v. Watts Mill
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 19, 1925No. 11723PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
March 19, 1925. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Action for damages on account of the death of A.E. Aldridge by alleged wrongful act of the defendants, brought by the administrator for the benefit of his intestate's widow, Hester C. Aldridge, as sole beneficiary. From judgment on verdict for the defendants, plaintiff appeals.
"The answer of respondent Watts Mill admits the death of Aldridge and denies the other allegations of the complaint, and alleges contributory negligence and contributory willfulness and wantonness on the part of A.E. Aldridge, and assumption of risk. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Horsford v. Carolina Glass Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Thornhill v. Davis, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Burgess v. Germany-Roy-Brown Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Bryce v. CayceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
- Duke v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- C. G. Bishop, Administrator of the Estate of Arthur Lee Baker, Jr., Deceased v. S. Hendricks, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Continental Jewelry Co. v. KerhulasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Hopkins v. Fidelity InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Ballard v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956