Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Fidelity Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 1962No. 17910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legge, Acting Justice.

Action is for damages for fraud and deceit. From a circuit court order overruling its demurrer to the complaint and denying, in part, its motion to strike certain allegations, defendant appeals.

The complaint alleged, in substance: that the plaintiff, twenty-six years old, husbandless, illiterate, and dependent for support on the kindness of relations and her own meager income as a part-time farm laborer, was on April 7, 1961, living as a tenant on the farm of one B. L. McCaskill with her' mother, an invalid uncle, a minor brother, and her two children, — a son aged five…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arrowood v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Prater v. Marble Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Aldridge, Admr. v. Watts MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. Holden v. McBroomTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gaskins v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Pilkington v. McBRAINSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. MUT. SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOC. v. McKenzieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Gaskins v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API