Legal Opinion
State v. Sulewski
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 19, 2006No. AC 26394PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to suppress items found at his residence following an investigative or Terry stop. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968).
The defendant, Kazmierz Sulewski, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered following his conditional plea of nolo contendere 1 to possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b). The court accepted the defendant’s plea after it denied his…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CorreaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. LEGRANDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. MannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. DemaioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. CorreaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018