Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Hawkins

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 26, 1984No. 61941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

444 So.2d 961 (1984)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Virgil D. HAWKINS, Respondent.

No. 61941.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 26, 1984.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Tallahassee, Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David G. McGunegle, Bar Counsel, Orlando, for complainant.

Virgil D. Hawkins, in pro. per.

2Per curiam

This cause is before us on a petition of The Florida Bar for review of a referee's report and recommendation. We have original jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

Respondent is a seventy-six-year-old sole practitioner with no prior record of disciplinary convictions…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. In Re Florida Bd. of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Florida · 1976

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Florida Bar v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Florida Bar v. GarciaSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Florida Bar v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API