Legal Opinion
William T. Spence v. Balogh & Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 28, 1963No. 17399_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a suit brought by plaintiff-appellant to require delivery of certain shares of stock, or, alternatively, to recover money damages. The facts are set out in the opinion of District Judge Jones. 216 F.Supp. 492 (1962) 1 For the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment of the District Court, dismissing the action on its merits after trial, will be
Affirmed.
1. See also Spence v. Northern Virginia Doctors Hospital Corp., 202 Va. 478, 117 S.E.2d 657 (1961).
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spence v. Balogh & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1962
- Spence v. Northern Virginia Doctors Hospital Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1961
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Joslyn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Estate of Joslyn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Vincent Demarco, Belle Pomerantz and Mary Roth, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Robert B. Edens, Martin Lasher, Precision Metal Products, Inc., Philip Tashman, Harry Schwartz, John Doe and Richard Roe, the Names John Doe and Richard Roe Being Fictitious, the True Names of Said Being Unknown to the Parties Intended Being More Fully Described in the Complaint, Anthony Grandinetti, Ai Langer, Angela Bennetti, Celia Israel, Stanley F. Harrison, Jr., Harold K. Stearns, and Helen Stearns v. Robert B. Edens, Martin Lasher, Precision Metal Products, Inc., Philip Tashman, Harry Schwartz, John Doe and Richard Roe, the Names John Doe and Richard Roe Being Fictitious, the True Names of Said Being Unknown to the Parties Intended Being More Fully Described in the ComplaintCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968