Legal Opinion
Stradley v. Capital Transit Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 26, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 2521-49PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
87 F.Supp. 94 (1949)
STRADLEY
v.
CAPITAL TRANSIT CO. (UNITED STATES, Third-party Defendant).
Civ. A. No. 2521-49.
United States District Court District of Columbia.
October 26, 1949.
George D. Horning, Jr., and Frank F. Roberson, Washington, D. C., Attorneys for defendant and third-party plaintiff.
George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., Ross O'Donoghue, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Stafford R. Grady, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., attorneys for third-party defendant.
PINE, District Judge.
This case presents the question whether the United States may be made a third-party defendant for the purpose of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Eastern Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Benbow v. Wolf. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Boston v. Old Orchard Business District, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1950
- Norton v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025