Legal Opinion

Clifford J Ochser v. Gerard funk/anthony Cruz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2011No. CV-11-0028-PRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Justice.

¶ 1 Clifford Ochser brought this civil rights action against two deputy sheriffs for arresting him on a warrant that had been quashed some thirteen months earlier. Although we hold that Ochser’s arrest was an unreasonable seizure prohibited by the Fourth Amendment, we conclude that the deputies are entitled to qualified immunity because then-existing law did not clearly establish the unconstitutionality of their actions.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to Ochser, against whom summary judgment was entered below.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Spooner v. PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  2. Kopacz v. Banner HealthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. City of Phoenix v. GarretsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Harianto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API