Legal Opinion

Wishnick-Tumpeer, Inc. v. Helvering

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 12, 1934No. 6015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

Petitioner, whom we shall call Tumpeer, was an Illinois corporation, and, prior to November 1, 1928, and thereafter, owned in excess of 95 per cent, of the stock of Pioneer Asphalt Company, also an Illinois corporation, whom we shall call Pioneer. Both Tumpeer and Pioneer filed separate returns for the taxable year 1928 on the basis of their regular accounting periods, which were, as to Tumpeer, the calendar year, and, as to Pioneer, the fiscal year ending October 31. Tumpeer on May 28, 1929, asked for and was granted permission by the Commissioner to change its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Morgan's, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. General MacHinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  2. France Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  3. Commissioner v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Wells-Gardner & Co. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API