Legal Opinion

Warren McCleskey Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 29, 1985No. 84-8176PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge,

with whom Judges TJOFLAT, JAMES C. HILL, FAY, VANCE, ALBERT J. HENDERSON and R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, join *:

This case was taken en banc principally to consider the argument arising in numerous capital cases that statistical proof shows the Georgia capital sentencing law is being administered in an unconstitutionally discriminatory and arbitrary and capricious matter. After a lengthy evidentiary hearing which focused on a study by Professor David C. Baldus, the district court concluded for a variety of reasons that the statistical evidence was insufficient to support the…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. William Anthony Brooks v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Goodwin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API