Legal Opinion
Friedman v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 10, 1959No. 2424PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
The amended complaint in this case, naming as defendants the District of Columbia, the Commissioners of the District, the District Water Registrar, Treasurer and Finance Officer, alleged that the plaintiff had purchased certain real estate in the District of Columbia; that at the time of purchase there was an unpaid water bill in the amount of $135.81 incurred by the former owner; and that although said unpaid water bill did not constitute a lien on the property, the Water Registrar had attempted to assert a lien, and the property had been sold by the defendants for said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schwartz v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Sheherazade, Inc. v. MardikianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Arlo Tatum, Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Paton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Brewer v. SimmonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Arlo Tatum, Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.