Legal Opinion

Cranston v. Wells Fargo Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1965No. S. F. No. 21566PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

The State Controller has appealed from an order upholding the executor’s objections to the valuation placed upon United States treasury bonds by the California inheritance tax appraiser.

Facts: The decedent owned United States treasury bonds with a total par value of $2,200,000. On the date of her death, these bonds were worth in the over-the-counter market $1,872,-185.63.

The federal government, through the Internal Revenue Code or by the terms of the bonds, permits their value to be accelerated to par value by the death of the owner to the extent that the bonds are used to pay federal estate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Company, as of the Will of Harriet Delta Ellis, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Estate of ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In re the Estate of BehmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  4. Estate of SlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Clapp v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Estate of GiolittiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. State Board of Equalization v. PowerMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Estate of RosenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API