State v. . Little
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Long, J., at tbe July Term, 1917, of RICHMOND. Tbe defendant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor to "W. E. Reynolds, and appealed from tbe judgment of imprisonment upon tbe verdict.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
1. A juror was called and stated upon bis examination that be would not convict any one on the testimony of W. E. Reynolds,, the witness upon whom the State bad to rely for a conviction, and the-court, in the exercise of its discretion, excused bim from service on tlie-jury, and the defendant excepted. This ruling is clearly correct (S. v. Vann, 162 N. C., 538), but if erroneous it was not prejudicial, as it does-not appear that any juror was challenged or that the jury wbicb served was not one entirely satisfactory to the defendant. S. v. Cunningham,. 72 N. C., 469.
2. The State was permitted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. Lipscomb.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- State v. MaultsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- State v. . CunninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- State v. DrakefordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Hass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- State v. CaliendoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
- State v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- People v. MartinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928