Legal Opinion

State v. Drakeford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1913PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Brag aw, J., at January Term, 1913, Of RICHMOND.

1Opinion of the CourtClaRK, C. J.

Tbe prisoner was indicted for rape upon “Lila” Hatcher. On the trial the evidence showed that it had been committed on “Liza” Hatcher. The prisoner’s counsel’ insisting that the names were not idem sonans, and that there was a fatal variance between tbe charge and tbe proof, tbe court granted tbe motion of tbe prisoner and instructed tbe jury to find tbe defendant not guilty of rape upon “Lila” Hatcber, but beld liim to appear at tbe next term of court to answer tbe charge of committing rape upon “Liza” Hatcber. This bill was so found, and when tbe prisoner was put upon trial bis counsel…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Joy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. State v. Bohanon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. State v. Horner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. Lipscomb.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. State v. MaultsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. . DonnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. . StefanoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API