Vinsant Electrical Contractors v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
The sole issue before the Court is the proper interpretation of the “Broad Form Property Damage Coverage” endorsement or rider to a comprehensive liability insurance policy. We granted certiorari because this is a matter of first impression in this jurisdiction.
I
The facts are either stipulated or are as contained in the undisputed testimony of a single witness as set forth in a proper bill of exceptions.
Petitioner, an electrical contractor, was engaged to install or mount, two 100 ampere circuit breakers in a panel board or switchboard located in the West Town Mall, a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hill v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
3Cited by24 opinions
- Jet Line Services, Inc. v. American Employers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Columbia Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaufSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- ACUITY v. Burd & Smith Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- W.E. O'Neil Construction Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Lusalon, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.