Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Almon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The defendant contends that the summary judgment should have been granted because the evidence demands a finding that the insurance policy was not binding in that it was issued subsequent to the date of the collision. This position is without merit.
As a general rule parties may agree that a policy be antedated, in which case it takes efféct on the date so agreed. 43 AmJur2d 386, Insurance, § 327. However, pretermitting a determination as to the efficacy of this rule under the circumstances of this case, we consider whether the defendant established, as a matter of law, that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Raven v. Dodd's Auto Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Short & Paulk Supply Co. v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Capital Automobile Co. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Pazol v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Irwin v. DaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- García Curbelo v. Autoridad de las Fuentes FluvialesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Fram Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Ash v. SpearCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Continental Insurance v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.