Legal Opinion

Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Almon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1970No. 45084PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant contends that the summary judgment should have been granted because the evidence demands a finding that the insurance policy was not binding in that it was issued subsequent to the date of the collision. This position is without merit.

As a general rule parties may agree that a policy be antedated, in which case it takes efféct on the date so agreed. 43 AmJur2d 386, Insurance, § 327. However, pretermitting a determination as to the efficacy of this rule under the circumstances of this case, we consider whether the defendant established, as a matter of law, that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Raven v. Dodd's Auto Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Short & Paulk Supply Co. v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Capital Automobile Co. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Pazol v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Irwin v. DaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. García Curbelo v. Autoridad de las Fuentes FluvialesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Fram Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  4. Ash v. SpearCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Continental Insurance v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API