Legal Opinion

Yost v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1930No. 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This suit was instituted in trespass to try title by appellees against appellants to recover the title and possession of lots 21, 22, 23, and 24 of the Uncle Sam addition to the city of Beaumont. Appellants answered by pleas of general demurrer, general denial, and not guilty. They specially pleaded improvements in good faith and the statute of ten years’ limitation. Also, they specially plead the following facts: On the 28th day of September, 1905, J. F. Horkan executed and delivered to David Janes his deed in writing to the lots sued for, to wit, Nos. 21, 22, 23, and 24. But these were not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Austin v. BainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Voelkel-Mclain Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Employers' Casualty Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. George v. DupignacCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Fenner, Beane & UngerleiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Carminati v. FenoglioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Garrison v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Tijerina v. TijerinaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Rutherford v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API